Los Angeles Arson Attorneys

Work With Award-Winning Attorneys

If you or someone you love has been charged with arson or unlawfully burning property, contacting an experienced lawyer should be your first priority. At Lessem, Newstat & Tooson, LLP, our Los Angeles arson defense lawyers are prepared to immediately review your case and explain how we can help.

Are you or a loved one facing arson charges? Click here for a free case evaluation!

What is Arson?

Arson is a criminal offense that occurs when an individual “willfully and maliciously” sets fire to certain types of property or land. Arson charges may also be brought against anyone who causes such property or land to burn or who aids, counsels, or procures the burning.

Under California Penal Code § 451, a person may face arson charges if they intentionally set fire to the following:

• Any structure (including buildings and homes)
• Forest land
• Any property not belonging to the person setting the fire

What Are the Types and Degrees of Arson Charges in California?

Arson is considered a serious offense because it has the potential to endanger others.

Penalties for arson depend on several factors, including:

1. The type of property or land involved
2. Whether another person was injured
3. Whether the fire was set intentionally or recklessly.

Arson Penalties in California

PC 451 details the following penalties for arson:

• Arson causing great bodily injury is a felony punishable by five, seven, or nine years in state prison.
• Arson of an inhabited structure or property is a felony punishable by three, five, or eight years in state prison.
• Arson of a structure or forest land is a felony punishable by two, four, or six years in state prison.
• Arson of another’s property is a felony punishable by 16, two, or three years in state prison.

Individuals charged with arson may also face enhancements if:

• They have been convicted of arson or an arson-related offense in the past
• Emergency personnel were injured
• More than one victim was injured, if multiple structures were burned
• A device was used to accelerate the fire or delay ignition.

What is California Penal Code § 452?

PC 452 is an arson-related offense that involves unlawfully causing a fire by reckless behavior. To be convicted of this offense, prosecutors must prove that a structure, forest land, or property was burned because an individual acted recklessly. An example of reckless burning may include throwing a cigarette into dry brush or flammable materials. Unlawfully causing a fire is typically a misdemeanor unless someone was injured or the property burned was an inhabited structure or forest land.

What Key Elements Must Prosecutors Prove to Secure an Arson Conviction?

To convict someone of arson under California Penal Code § 451, prosecutors must establish four core elements beyond a reasonable doubt, forming a rigorous evidentiary framework that defense attorneys often challenge.

• First, the act must be willful and malicious, meaning the defendant intentionally set the fire or aided in its setting, not accidentally. Mere negligence doesn’t suffice here, unlike in reckless burning cases under § 452.
• Second, the fire must have burned or charred a structure, forest land, or property; complete destruction isn’t required, but some damage from flames or heat must occur.
• Third, the property involved must fit the statute’s definitions—structures include any building, inhabited or not; forest land covers wild areas prone to wildfires; and property encompasses items like vehicles or belongings not owned by the accused.
• Finally, causation links the defendant’s actions directly to the fire, often proven through forensic evidence like accelerant residues or witness testimonies.

This burden of proof is high because arson investigations rely heavily on circumstantial evidence, such as fire patterns analyzed by experts, which can be contested. In federal cases, an additional element often involves a nexus to interstate commerce, but in state proceedings, the focus remains on local impact and intent, making expert testimony pivotal in debunking or affirming these elements.

Differences Between State and Federal Arson Laws

While both California state and federal arson laws target the malicious use of fire to damage property, key differences lie in jurisdiction, elements of the crime, and penalties, often determining whether a case stays local or escalates to federal courts.

California’s Penal Code § 451 focuses on willful and malicious burning of structures, forest land, or property within the state, with no requirement for interstate involvement. In contrast, federal arson primarily applies when the property affects interstate or foreign commerce, such as businesses, vehicles in commercial use, or federal lands, or when explosives are involved. This interstate nexus is a crucial element absent in state laws, allowing federal prosecution for acts like burning a chain store or using fire in insurance fraud schemes crossing state lines.

Jurisdictionally, state cases are handled by local district attorneys and emphasize community safety, like wildfire prevention, while federal involvement from agencies like the ATF brings resources for complex investigations but stricter sentencing guidelines.

What Rights Do Individuals Accused of Arson Have?

Individuals facing arson charges in California are afforded robust constitutional protections under both state and federal law, ensuring a fair process from arrest through trial and designed to prevent miscarriages of justice in these high-stakes cases. Foremost is the right to remain silent under the Fifth Amendment, preventing self-incrimination during interrogations. Invoking this early, often with counsel present, is critical as arson cases hinge on statements that could imply intent.

The Sixth Amendment guarantees the right to an attorney, including a court-appointed attorney if indigent, who can challenge evidence like fire investigator reports. Accused persons also have the right to a speedy and public trial by an impartial jury. Due process under the Fourteenth Amendment ensures fair treatment, including access to exculpatory evidence from prosecutors, which might include alternative fire causes like electrical faults.

In pretrial phases, rights extend to reasonable bail (unless flight risk) and protection against unreasonable searches. Evidence from warrantless scenes can be suppressed. Post-conviction, appeal rights allow review for errors, such as improper jury instructions on malice. These safeguards are especially important in arson cases, where scientific evidence can be debatable, empowering the accused to mount a strong defense and highlighting why immediate legal representation is essential to uphold these protections.

Common Defenses Against Arson Allegations

Defending against arson allegations in California requires a tailored strategy that exploits weaknesses in the prosecution’s case, often turning on scientific scrutiny and alternative explanations to create reasonable doubt.

• A primary defense is a lack of intent, arguing the fire was accidental rather than willful and malicious. Evidence like faulty wiring or natural causes can shift the charge to lesser reckless burning under § 452 or lead to dismissal.
• Another common approach is challenging the evidence chain, questioning arson investigators’ methods; independent experts might reveal biases or errors in determining the fire’s origin, such as misidentifying accelerants.
• Alibi defenses prove the accused wasn’t present, supported by timestamps, witnesses, or digital records, while mistaken identity counters cases relying on unreliable eyewitnesses.
• Insufficiency of evidence attacks the elements, like proving no actual burning occurred or that the property didn’t qualify under the statute.

In some instances, defenses invoke entrapment if authorities induced the act, or highlight procedural violations like illegal searches and suppressing key evidence. With California’s emphasis on forensic proof, these defenses often introduce doubt, potentially reducing charges or securing acquittals, making expert consultation invaluable.

Why Is Hiring an Arson Defense Attorney Crucial for Your Case?

At Lessem, Newstat & Tooson, LLP, we understand the overwhelming stress of facing arson charges under California Penal Code § 451 or § 452, and we’re here to serve as your dedicated advocates, combining decades of legal expertise with thorough investigative skills to safeguard your future. We excel in negotiating favorable plea agreements, often downgrading felonies to misdemeanors or arranging diversion programs, particularly for those new to the system. In the courtroom, our attorneys masterfully cross-examine witnesses, scrutinize forensic evidence, and deploy defenses, frequently shifting outcomes in jury trials where technical details are key.

Given the grave repercussions of arson convictions—lengthy prison terms, substantial fines, and enduring personal and professional damage—attempting to handle this alone can be catastrophic. With our up-to-date knowledge of changing laws, we not only battle the charges head-on but also work to lessen broader effects, such as preserving your professional licenses or employment opportunities. We’re committed to delivering the best possible results, offering 24/7 availability for consultations because we know that early intervention can make all the difference. Let us put our award-winning experience to work for you today.

To request a free legal consultation, call (818) 643-3093. We are available 24/7.